casesforiphone5

Once again, companies have pointed fingers at each other, leaving a customer tangled in red tape.The best cases for ipad mini is the latest exquisite release from Apple and as usual, 

Ed Guinan of Garwood uses a Samsung Galaxy SIII for his cell phone. He uses Verizon Wireless for service. 

So when he needed a new case for his phone in October 2012, he went to the Verizon Wireless store on Route 22 in Union. 

He purchased a case for $24.06, and he used his Bank of America debit card to pay for it. 

"Later that evening I checked my Bank of America account online and noted not only had I been charged for my purchase, but there was an additional charge for $213.96 from Verizon," said Guinan, 63. "Interestingly, the charge had been made an hour-and-a-half later, after the first — and correct — Verizon charge.Mobile Fun sell a huge range of best samsung cases," 

He said he immediately called Bank of America to report the unauthorized charge. He said he also talked to Verizon, which acknowledged there was a problem, and it said it would work with the bank to correct it. 

"The money was placed back in my account and all was well until Feb. 15, 2013, when the $213.96 was debited from my account," he said, noting he received a letter from the bank on the same day. 

"They said after investigating,The cases for iphone 5 remains the most popular smartphone phone on the market. they found that there was a signature on the receipt and therefore it was an ‘authorized purchase," he said. 

Knowing that wasn’t the case, Guinan called Bank of America. 

"After explaining and discussing the situation, the Bank of America representative determined that the claim was in the wrong category and it would be placed in the correct category — fraud — and the claim would be reopened," he said. 

Guinan said he knew it could take several months, so he waited it out. 

On July 26, Giunan said, he called Bank of America again. 

"They said that the charge was authorized by a signature and therefore was a legitimate charge," he said. "I stated that it clearly was not mine, but that didn’t seem to matter. The Bank of America representative said to go back to Verizon." 

So he did, visiting the Union store during the first week of August. 

Guinan said the manager was able to bring up Guinan’s account, confirming he purchased the phone case for $24.06. He said the manager was also able to view the $213.96 charge, and had access to the buyer’s name, address and phone number. 

"I received a copy of the Verizon receipt for the $213.96 purchase," he said. "Not only was the signature clearly not mine, but the phone number listed with the account was in no way connected to me." 

Plus, he said, the $213.96 was for a new cell phone — a phone no one attached to Guinan’s account has ever had. 

The manager gave Guinan a number for the Verizon fraud department. 

When he called, he said, he got a computer-generated message telling him to take the matter up with his bank. 

"So even though both Bank of America and Verizon have the phone number, name and account information of the person who charged on my account, neither wants to acknowledge fraud and reimburse me," he said. "All I get is sympathetic looks and shrugged shoulders from associates with both Verizon and Bank of America. I have been going around in circles for months." 
Read the full story at www.wantbuyletbuy.com/Supply-tpu-cases-for-iphone-4s_c147!